GEO Agency

Generative Engine Optimization

Perplexity, Google Gemini, ChatGPT and Copilot are changing how buyers research. Our Generative Engine Optimization services help your brand get featured as a trusted source inside the answer.

Generative engines don't just rank pages — they synthesise an answer and choose which sources to cite inside it. Your competitors are being cited right now, in the exact prompts your buyers are typing.

GEO is how you get visible on those surfaces. We map the prompt universe, restructure content so models can lift it cleanly, strengthen your entity and authority signals, and measure citation movement prompt by prompt.

No commitment. Just an honest read on your AI search opportunity.

Prompt coverage snapshot

Perplexitybest vendors for …
CitedRecommended
Geminialternatives to …
CitedNot recommended
ChatGPThow do we evaluate …
CitedRecommended
Copilotis … any good?
Not citedNot recommended

Illustrative view of how we score every prompt: citation and recommendation tracked as two separate outcomes.

GEO retrieval path Live model
Buyer prompt
Source retrieval
Answer synthesis
Brand recommended
GEO improves the path from a buyer prompt to a cited, recommended brand.

Generative Engine Optimization in 78 seconds

A short walkthrough of how generative engines pick the brands they name, and how our programme moves that outcome.

55 seconds. What Generative Engine Optimization is, how the four-phase programme runs, and why we track citations and recommendations separately.

Why Generative Engine Optimization matters

Generative search is not a forecast. Buyers already open Perplexity, Gemini or ChatGPT to build a shortlist, compare vendors and validate a decision — and each of those surfaces must attribute the sources behind its answer. That attribution is a distribution channel, and in many categories it is still uncontested.

Two outcomes

Cited ≠ recommended

A cited source is frequently not the brand the answer actually recommends. We score both.

3–6 months

Typical time to durable citation share

Faster than a comparable traditional SEO programme in the same category.

100+ prompts

Locked prompt universe per engagement

Re-run on a fixed cadence so movement reflects the programme, not prompt drift.

The brands that build citation share now will be the defaults their categories inherit. If you want the measurement layer before the strategy, start with an AI visibility audit or read what Generative Engine Optimization actually is.

How GEO compares to traditional SEO

They are not competing channels. They are complementary — here is how they differ.

FactorTraditional SEOGenerative Engine Optimization (GEO)
Primary goalRank in Google resultsGet cited inside AI-generated answers
PlatformsGoogle, BingPerplexity, Gemini, ChatGPT, Copilot
Key metricRankings and clicksCitations, recommendations, share of voice
Typical timeline6–12 months3–6 months
CompetitionExtremely highLow to medium — first-mover advantage remains
User intentInformational through transactionalResearch, comparison, validation
Content strategyKeyword targeting and backlinksAuthority signals and semantic clarity
Traffic profileHigh volumeLower volume, higher intent

The winning sequence: get the technical and content foundation right, then layer GEO and Answer Engine Optimization on top. Strong classic search visibility makes generative visibility arrive faster — see our GEO vs AEO vs SEO breakdown.

Our 4-phase GEO methodology

A documented process for getting cited in generative engines — and for proving it happened. The full framework lives on our methodology page.

1

Weeks 1–2

Discover your generative search opportunity

  • Baseline your current visibility across Perplexity, Gemini, ChatGPT and Copilot
  • Identify the prompts where generative engines cite your competitors instead of you
  • Score citation potential page by page (which assets can realistically be lifted)
  • Competitive benchmarking — who is cited, for what, and from which source domains
  • Technical foundation assessment: crawlability, rendering, indexation, feed hygiene

Deliverables

  • AI search visibility audit report
  • Citation opportunity map by prompt
  • Competitive benchmark analysis
  • Technical remediation list
2

Weeks 3–4

Build your GEO strategy

  • Content roadmap: what to create, what to restructure, what to retire
  • Platform-specific tactics — Perplexity, Gemini, ChatGPT and Copilot reward different signals
  • Authority plan built on real experience, expertise, authoritativeness and trust signals
  • Internal linking and topical cluster architecture
  • Sequenced timeline with expected citation velocity by quarter

Deliverables

  • Custom GEO strategy document
  • Prioritised content roadmap
  • Platform-specific optimisation playbook
  • Authority and citation-building plan
3

Weeks 5–12

Implement and optimise

  • Restructure priority content into answer-first, retrieval-ready passages
  • Implement schema and structured data so models can parse claims unambiguously
  • Strengthen author bios, credentials and citation trails on every substantive page
  • Publish genuinely citation-worthy assets: original data, research and firsthand analysis
  • Build topical clusters and earn Gap-Fill Placement on the sources engines already trust

Deliverables

  • Optimised priority content library
  • JSON-LD schema implementation
  • Author and entity authority framework
  • New original research and data assets
4

Month 4 onward

Track, monitor and improve

  • Recurring citation tracking against a locked prompt universe
  • Citation and recommendation scored as two separate lines, never conflated
  • Competitive share-of-voice benchmarking each quarter
  • Monthly strategy session with the next set of prioritised moves
  • Continuous discovery of newly emerging prompts and platforms

Deliverables

  • Citation tracking dashboard
  • Monthly performance report
  • Monthly strategy session
  • Ongoing content and schema optimisation

We optimize for every major generative engine

Each platform retrieves differently. Same measurement framework, different tactics.

How to get cited in Perplexity

Sources are cited inline with clear, clickable attribution.

  • Original research and first-party data are heavily favoured
  • Depth beats surface-level coverage on the same query
  • Author expertise signals carry real retrieval weight
  • Substantive long-form pages accumulate more citations
  • Recency matters — stale pages lose ground quickly
Perplexity SEO services

How to get cited in Google Gemini & AI Overviews

Sources linked inside AI-generated answers and Overviews.

  • Classic Google visibility strongly influences generative inclusion
  • Structured data is weighted more heavily than on most platforms
  • E-E-A-T signals decide inclusion on considered-purchase topics
  • YMYL subject matter needs verifiable expert authorship
  • Freshness and update cadence affect eligibility
Gemini SEO services

How to get cited in ChatGPT & Claude

Sources surfaced in-conversation alongside browsed answers.

  • Conversational, direct writing is retrieved more reliably
  • Pages that answer one specific question well outperform hub pages
  • Technical depth paired with plain-language explanation wins
  • Source diversity matters — single-source claims are de-weighted
  • Proprietary data earns disproportionate citation share
ChatGPT SEO services

How to get cited in Microsoft Copilot

Attributed sources with direct links across Bing, Windows and Office.

  • Bing visibility feeds Copilot and is routinely neglected
  • Professional and technical content is weighted for enterprise queries
  • Comprehensive schema markup is effectively table stakes
  • Credible enterprise and trade sources lift retrieval
  • Technical accuracy and update recency are prerequisites
AI visibility monitoring
Results

What this work has produced

Individual engagement outcomes — AI Overview citations earned, coverage movement over time, and growth in ranking queries — are documented on our case studies page, each attributed to the single engagement it came from rather than presented as a portfolio average.

Read the case studies

Who wins most with GEO?

Generative Engine Optimization compounds fastest for organisations with real expertise and evidence to publish. These profiles fit best.

SaaS and technology

Buying committees now run vendor shortlists through generative engines before a single demo is booked. Most categories still have wide-open citation space.

SaaS SEO

Professional services

Expertise and credentials translate almost directly into retrieval weight, and the leads that arrive through AI answers are unusually well qualified.

Professional services AI search

Publishers and content businesses

Generative engines run on sources. Publishers with original reporting and data have the most natural structural advantage of any category.

Digital PR for AI citations

Education and training

Prospective students research programmes conversationally. Curriculum depth and instructor credentials are exactly the signals engines look for.

Technical SEO agency

Technical innovators and thought leaders

Original research, benchmarks and firsthand technical analysis are the highest-value citation currency in generative search.

Technical SEO agency

Not sure GEO is right for you? Review published pricing or book a strategy call and we'll tell you honestly whether the opportunity is there.

GEO Frequently Asked Questions

Related GEO services and reading

Ranking is no longer enough

You need to be cited, mentioned, and recommended.

Being cited, mentioned, and recommended are three different outcomes, and most brands only ever achieve the first one. Ranking is no longer enough because AI engines answer buyers directly and name only a short list of vendors as the recommendation — everyone else is cited in passing, if at all. Get a free AI Visibility Report to see exactly where your brand appears today across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, Perplexity, and Copilot, where competitors are winning the recommendation instead, and what's keeping you from moving up the shortlist.